Confirmed! The CIA did NOT take the mandatory COVID-19 vaccines.
They said everyone had to take it... except they never did.
With Dr. Fauci perched over Biden's left shoulder & Kamala over his right the President signed Executive Order 14043 on September 9, 2021, requiring approximately 5.82 million Americans to be fully vaccinated by no later than November 22, 2021.
The scope of the executive order's compliance included:
806,063 National Guard, Reserves, and Coast Guard
778,539 Military civilian workers
1.29 million Active-duty military
2.95 million Federal civilian employees
^These individuals had to receive either two doses of an mRNA vaccine (plus two weeks) or one dose of Johnson & Johnson (plus two weeks).
In my community living near the nation's largest Navy base, panic and outrage grew over the mandate, which involved a vaccine that had only been available to the public for less than a year [ 337 days.]
Suspecting many high level federal employees might not comply, I waited a whole week after the compliance deadline before submitting a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the CIA on November 27, 2021, asking for their COVID-19 vaccination compliance data.
**Reminder**- By the time I had submitted the request they had already been one week past the required deadline for vaccine compliance. **
Timeline of My FOIA Request:
November 29, 2021: CIA confirmed receipt of my request & I was assigned Mark Lilly as the case agent. They began processing my request.
Summer 2022: After repeated calls and voicemails, no update was provided.
October 18, 2022: CIA delivered a letter stating my request was still being processed, with an estimated completion date of May 10, 2024.
May 10, 2024: No response. Online status showed "In Processing."
Summer 2024: More calls and voicemails, but no updates. I even filmed and uploaded to X more than two dozen videos of me carrying out those phone calls.
October 14, 2024: I received a letter via email informing me that they recognized that they had missed their estimated completion date, & that they had received my voicemails. The CIA case agent [Stephen Glenn] gave me a new estimated completion date set for January 9, 2026..
October 21, 2024: I appealed via fax, challenging the new completion date.
December 5, 2024: CIA issued a "Final Response" from Stephen Glenn, claiming that their searches resulted in no documents responsive to my request. They also stated that any further searches were "highly unlikely" to produce results but noted that I technically did have a right to appeal their findings if I wanted to.
The time between when the CIA had to be in compliance with the EO and the date when they told me there were no responsive records was 1,116 days, or 3 years and 20 days. In that same time frame, it was reported that 98% of those 5.82 million mandated Americans did receive the COVID-19 vaccines.
The VAERS system, owned and operated jointly by the FDA & the CDC has millions of adverse event reports that include over 38,000 deaths, 28,769 cases of Myocarditis/Pericarditis and 72,492 reports of Permanent Disability following the administration of a COVID-19 vaccine. Now the people are seeing sudden onset of cancers, & aggressive recurrences of cancers that were previously in remission throughout the country.
Did the CIA know how dangerous the injections were & rather than doing the right thing they just stayed silent while watching millions of Americans get poisoned? If so, then why did the CIA’s venture capital arm In-Q-Tel get involved in funding a new CDMO vaccine manufacturing company called, Government Resilience Services which had announced that they would manufacture the COVID-19 vaccines for Moderna on September 8, 2021 one day before President Biden would sign the Executive order mandating the very same vaccines?
I am of course going to appeal this “final response” from the CIA but at the current moment I interpret their determination as an admission that the CIA staff did not comply. If there are no records of vaccination within the CIA concerning COVID-19 then they either did not comply or they utilized a verbal reporting system as a means of receipt of vaccine for the entire staff. Both possibilities are completely unacceptable especially in the face of the thousands of Americans who lost; their careers, and livelihoods or even worse those who complied and were subsequently injured due to the C19 injections.
"Rules for thee but not for me " is the same theme of governance that our forefathers fled in order to found this great country. Ultimately I think the timing of this response reflects strongly the fear the current administration has knowing that big changes are imminent due to the incoming administration. Had they made me wait until 2026 they know they'd likely be forced by the new leadership to release the records which likely would have shown the CIA's lack of compliance thus leaving them vulnerable to accountability and repercussions. Being seemingly allergic to accountability they tried to hush up my request before having to face the music.
Where is the outcry for justice or adherence to the color of law? What difference is this from the tyranny of socialist countries?
Our American Leaders act as domestic terrorist to the American people.
While I appreciate your work and this write-up, fun fact: As it relates to our forefathers, 'Rules for thee but not for me' were in direct response to the notion that colonists should not be allowed to slaughter indigenous Americans for their land beyond the Appalachian line, nor keep in place a slave class and "trade" that allowed "property owners" to amass and extract an amount of private wealth that was starting to terrify the ruling class of the time. Thus, with such a founding, it should come as no surprise that "property owners" who were eventually transformed into corporations with human rights but without all that annoying and pesky accountability that common people are required to abide by can most optimally allow for the desire to live by their most favorite motto of 'We do what we want, bitches!'